Building your Future Today

Un Convention On International Settlement Agreements Resulting From Mediation

[4] However, please note that Member States benefit from the 2008/52/EC Mediation Directive, which allows cross-border transaction agreements to be applied by the national courts of EU Member States. In addition, Article 5 of the Singapore Convention includes defences similar to those of Article V of the New York Convention, including the defence of the inability to enter into an arbitration agreement and (ii) where the subject matter of the dispute is not in a position to settle by arbitration (mediation) according to the law of the country where recognition or enforcement is sought. In addition, the Singapore Agreement also contains a provision that reflects the defence of application by the New York Convention: (iii) the defence of “public order”. The agreement does not apply to transaction agreements which: mediation is known to improve the effectiveness of dispute resolution and flexibility. The role of the mediator is not to decide, but rather to facilitate discussion between the parties to the dispute in order to reach a mutually acceptable solution. The mediation process is more flexible and, in many cases, less costly and more efficient over time than other dispute resolution procedures, such as litigation and arbitration proceedings. On the first day of the signing of the Singapore Agreement (August 7, 2019), 46 states, including the United States, Singapore and China, signed the agreement. There were 53 in January 2020. At the time of the letter (October 2020), six of these signatories ratified the convention (Singapore, Qatar and Fiji, for which the convention came into force on 12 September 2020, followed by Saudi Arabia in November 2020, Belarus in January 2021 and Ecuador in March 2021). [3] None of the EU Member States or the EU itself has yet signed the convention. [4] Similarly, according to a statement of principles by the British Government in June 2020 and the parliamentary discussions that followed in September 2020, no formal decision has yet been taken on the UK`s accession to the Convention. [5] [1] Available under: uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/conventions/international_settlement_agreements.

The UN Model Law on International Trade Mediation and International Comparison Agreements, which stems from the mediation of 2018 (amendment to the UNCLOS Model Law on International Trade Conciliation, 2002), continues Article 3. Article 3 deals with the main obligations of the parties to the agreement both with respect to the application of the transaction agreements and the right of a litigant to refer to a transaction agreement that falls within the scope of the agreement. Any party to the convention can define the procedural mechanisms that can be followed if the convention does not impose requirements. Article 4 includes the formalities of recourse to a transaction agreement, i.e. the party to the dispute provides the relevant authority with the transaction contract it has signed and proves that the transaction agreement is the result of mediation. The competent authority may require any documents necessary to verify that the requirements of the convention are being met. Where a state has ratified the convention, the Convention stipulates that a court of justice (or any other competent authority) implements an international dispute settlement agreement in that state, in accordance with the convention and its own internal settlement, without the parties being obliged to initiate a new procedure because of its recognition and enforcement. To the extent that the transaction agreement is within the scope of the agreement, the negotiated regime can also be invoked by the parties as a defence in order to avoid further litigation or arbitration in a matter already settled by the agreement.